The recent news on the control of communications made by the US Government through the PRISM program has literally left bewildered public opinion, everyone imagined it but when the Population has been confronted with the evidence remained shocked.
The Washington Post recently published an interesting article that tries to explain how the complex US machine for surveillance works. NSA and FBI systematically draw on information from central servers of the leading companies in the computer industry:
The surveillance project began in 2007 and it was supported by the Bush’s administration, it is known as PRISM and is capable to acquire sensitive data from the IT majors and then operate complex analysis activities, of course, companies deny any knowledge of the secret program.
“Google cares deeply about the security of our users’ data. We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we review all such requests carefully. From time to time, people allege that we have created a government ‘back door’ into our systems, but Google does not have a back door for the government to access private user data.” Google states.
“We do not provide any government organization with direct access to Facebook servers,” “When Facebook is asked for data or information about specific individuals, we carefully scrutinize any such request for compliance with all applicable laws, and provide information only to the extent required by law.” said Joe Sullivan, chief security officer for Facebook.
“We have never heard of PRISM,” “We do not provide any government agency with direct access to our servers, and any government agency requesting customer data must get a court order.”said Steve Dowling, a spokesman for Apple.
The Washington Post has published an interesting post on running of PRISM detailed in secret documents, it revealed that the PRISM project has been referred at least 1477 times during a government briefing on the Homeland Security.
The document claims “collection directly from the servers” of major US IT service providers with principal argumentation to defend the project is the necessity of communications surveillance for security reasons and counterterrorism.
“information collected under this program is among the most important and valuable foreign intelligence information we collect, and is used to protect our nation from a wide variety of threats. The unauthorized disclosure of information about this important and entirely legal program is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans.” Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper said.
According the revelation PRISM became popular during the Arab Spring when it was used to profile individuals considered dangerous for the US.
The Guardian has verified the authenticity of the PowerPoint presentation that is circulating on the Internet, it is composed of 41 slides classified as top secret with no distribution to foreign allies which was apparently used to train operatives.
Although the presentation claims the program is run with the assistance of the companies, all those who responded to a Guardian request for comment on Thursday denied knowledge of any such program.
Is PRISM legal?
The US program seems to be allowed by “section 215 of the Patriot Act, which authorizes the existence of special procedures, authorized by the FISA court to force U.S. companies to deliver assets and records of their customers, from the metadata to confidential communications, including e-email, chat, voice and video, videos and photos”.
Any further comment seems superfluous … all imagined something like this, the reality exceeds imagination … the situation is unsettling.
I leave you with a few of questions
(Security Affairs – Surveillance, PRISM)
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.