On March 20, Google security team has discovered and blocked fraudulent digital certificates issued for several Google domains. The investigation revealed that a Chinese certificate authority was using an intermediate CA, MCS Holdings, that issued the bogus Google digital certificates. The circumstance is worrying because the MCS Holdings could have issued digital certificates for virtually any domain of the company.
Google issued an update for the revocation list included in the Chrome browser in order to revoke the fraudulent certificate, meantime it has also alerted other browser vendors to the security issue. Google contacted officials at CNNIC, the Chinese registrar who authorized the intermediate CA, and the officials said that they were working with MCS to issue certificates for domains that it registered.
Google promptly reported the issued to the CNNIC, the Chinese registrar that authorized the intermediate CA, that confirmed MCS issues certificates for domains that it registered. It seems that the private key was installed on man-in-the-middle proxy, a network equipment used to eavesdrop secure connections by impersonating the intended destination for surveillance purpose.
“CNNIC responded on the 22nd to explain that they had contracted with MCS Holdings on the basis that MCS would only issue certificates for domains that they had registered. However, rather than keep the private key in a suitable HSM, MCS installed it in a man-in-the-middle proxy. These devices intercept secure connections by masquerading as the intended destination and are sometimes used by companies to intercept their employees’ secure traffic for monitoring or legal reasons,” wrote Adam Langley from Google in a blog post.
Langley highlighted the risks related to such kind of operation, the problem is that the CNNIC authority is trusted by all of the major browsers exposing users to serious risks.
“The employees’ computers normally have to be configured to trust a proxy for it to be able to do this. However, in this case, the presumed proxy was given the full authority of a public CA, which is a serious breach of the CA system.” wrote Langley “CNNIC is included in all major root stores and so the misissued certificates would be trusted by almost all browsers and operating systems. Chrome on Windows, OS X, and Linux, ChromeOS, and Firefox 33 and greater would have rejected these certificates because of public-key pinning, although misissued certificates for other sites likely exist,”
In December 2013 a similar incident occurred, security experts at Google discovered the unauthorized use of digital certificates issued by an intermediate certificate authority linked to ANSSI for several Google domains.
ANSSI is the French CyberSecurity agency that operates with French intelligence agencies, the organization declared that an intermediate CA was generating fake-certificate to conduct MITM attack and inspect SSL traffic. Be aware that an intermediate CA certificate carries the full authority of the CA, attackers can use it to create a certificate for any website they wish to hack.
“ANSSI has found that the intermediate CA certificate was used in a commercial device, on a private network, to inspect encrypted traffic with the knowledge of the users on that network. This was a violation of their procedures and they have asked for the certificate in question to be revoked by browsers. We updated Chrome’s revocation metadata again to implement this,” reported Google.
Google discovered the ongoing MITM attack and blocked it, Google has declared that ANSSI has requested to block an intermediate CA certificate.
(Security Affairs – MITM, digital certificate)
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.